Skip to content .

Fetal medicine cases

P v East Gloucestershire NHS Trust (2003) - Failure to diagnose spina bifida on routine anomaly scan - surgery for closure of myelomeningocele - paraplegia - incontinence of urine and faeces - hydrocephalus - settlement £45,000

W v Guy’s & St. Thomas’ Hospitals NHS Trust (2003) - VACTRL syndrome - abnormalities of upper limbs and genito-urinary function - settlement £360,000

 

Full case details

P v East Gloucestershire NHS Trust (2003)

Mr and Mrs P instructed Paul McNeil in connection with the birth of their son, Gareth, on 26 April 1999.

Mrs P became pregnant with Gareth in July 1998 and attended a routine anomaly ultra sound scan in November 1998. The scan was reported as normal and the pregnancy continued until Gareth’s birth on 26 April 1999.

Immediately after birth the paediatricians noted that Gareth had spina bifida, which had not been diagnosed ante-natally.

Gareth was immediately transferred to the Frenchay Hospital where surgery for the closure of the myelomeningocele was carried out on 27 April 1999. Gareth has continued to have significant problems including paraplegia, incontinence of urine and faeces and hydrocephalus.

We alleged the midwives and the ultra sonographers had been negligent in failing to identify Gareth’s spina bifida prior to his birth, particularly at the ultrasound scan in November 1998.

Proceedings were issued in April 2002. Shortly after this, the defendants admitted negligence and the matter proceeded on the basis of quantum of damages only.

After protracted negotiations, the matter was settled in December 2003 in the sum of £750,000.

 

W v Guy’s & St. Thomas’ Hospitals NHS Trust (2003)

Paul McNeil acted for Mr and Mrs W in connection with a claim for medical negligence arising out of the treatment Mrs W received at hospital during the pregnancy ending with the birth of AW on 5 July 1999. A suffered from VACTRL syndrome which meant that she had abnormalities of the upper limbs and genito-urinary function.

It was alleged that with proper obstetric care Mrs W’s pregnancy would have been terminated and A would not have been born.

The issue of liability was agreed between the parties. The W’s agreed to accept 90% of the full value of the claim.

The case was settled in the sum of £360,000 in July 2003 to include compensation for pain and suffering to the parents, extra care, the cost of treatment and Mrs W’s loss of earnings.