Skip to content .

Anaesthesia cases

M v Mount Alvernia Hospital (2001)

M was admitted to the Mount Alvernia Hospital for laser laparoscopy for suspected endometriosis on 3 November 1997. During the surgery, the patient was anaesthetised but she was not ventilated with oxygen for a period of about 10 minutes due to the negligence of the consultant anaesthetist. In addition, the anaesthetist failed to ventilate M continuously for some hours following the surgery to ensure adequate oxygenation.

As a result of the negligence, M suffered hypoxic cerebral damage. Fortunately, her recovery was good but she still suffers memory impairment, impaired concentration and continuing cognitive weaknesses, including a mild general deterioration of her intellectual function.

Negligence was immediately admitted, but causation and quantum of damages were strenuously denied.

At the time of the negligence, M was a qualified midwife who had been undertaking a degree course in health studies. It was her intention to qualify as a primary school teacher. She has not been able to work full-time since the accident.

The trial was fixed for 29 October and Paul McNeil settled the case a few days before trial in the sum of £305,000.

 

J v H (1998)

J, a 56 year old man, was admitted to hospital for a secondary coronary artery by-pass operation as a private patient. Notwithstanding a history of asthma, the anaesthetist failed to examine J during a pre-operative assessment. J suffered an asthma attack during the anaesthetic. Initially, the anaesthetist failed to recognise this and when he did diagnose it, he administered a massive overdose of Salbutamol. Sadly, J suffered circulatory collapse and died. It was alleged that J's death was caused by severe hypoxia as a result of the delay in diagnosing and treating the bronchospasm and/or the administration of an excessive dose of Salbutamol.

At the time of his death, J was a director of Merrill Lynch Europe Limited and an Executive Director of Merrill Lynch International Bank Limited. His wife’s claim for financial dependency was substantial even on a limited life expectancy and the claim settled in the sum of £475,000, plus costs.

 

M v East Hertfordshire Health Authority (1991)

M, a 68 year old man, presented to the accident and emergency department of his local hospital with a history of vomiting and a diagnosis of an irreductable right inguinal hernia was made. M was taken to theatre to surgically reduce the hernia. The anaesthetist was aware of the history of vomiting and yet failed to apply cricoid pressure correctly or at all during the administration of the anaesthetic or the endo-tracheal tube. During the procedure M regurgitated the contents of his stomach and this entered his lungs. As a result, he suffered Mendelson’s Syndrome. He was admitted to ITU and was ventilated mechanically. M made gradual improvement and was eventually discharged just over one month after he was admitted, but he continued to suffer from shortness of breath, lack of concentration and poor memory. He had to give up work as a self-employed lorry driver.

A settlement was agreed in the sum of £42,500 plus costs.